Scott Richard, CEO of Reconnect Research and member in good standing with AAPOR agrees on behalf of Reconnect Research with and strictly abides by the following AAPOR statement.
Condemned Survey Practices
AAPOR joins the Research Industry Coalition and the National Council on Public Polls in condemning certain misleading practices sometimes performed in the name of research. In no case are the following practices deemed legitimate or acceptable elements of professionally conducted research:
- Requiring a monetary payment or soliciting monetary contributions from members of the public as part of a research process.
This set of practices amounts to fund raising under the guise of research (frugging). In some cases, unwary members of the public are enticed to contribute money as a condition of gaining some future “benefit” from their participation. It takes unfair advantage of the cooperative attitude that a majority of the public manifests when asked to take part in a legitimate information gathering process.
- Offering products or services for sale, or using participant contacts as a means of generating sales leads.
A common practice is to gain entry or acceptance in order to make a sales pitch by initially defining the contact as being made for “research” purposes. This trades on the prestige of science, and it exploits the willingness of the public to reveal information about themselves in the public interest. In some cases, questions establish respondents’ susceptibility to sales pressure or their interest in some product or service. Follow-up contacts are then made to those so identified, all under the guise of “research” (sugging).
- Revealing the identity of individual respondents to a survey or participants in a research process without their permission.
It is normal research practice to pledge anonymity or confidentiality to the public in order to secure their cooperation and frankness in responding to questions. Revealing the identity of individuals, for whatever purpose, is a violation of that pledge unless a respondent’s prior informed consent has been obtained.
- Representing the results of a self-selected “poll” as if they were the outcome of legitimate research.
Write-in, call-in, and interactive polls have become increasingly common. These “polls” report the opinions of only those people who called in, and not those of the general public. AAPOR believes that any publicizing or promotion of such activities not only damages legitimate market and survey research, but can be very misleading when used to influence public policy or simply to disseminate information about the general public.
- Conducting a so-called “push poll,” a telemarketing technique in which telephone calls are used to canvass potential voters, feeding them false or misleading “information” about a candidate under the pretense of taking a poll to see how this “information” affects voter preferences.
So-called “Push polls” are not polls at all. They are a form of political telemarketing whose intent is not to measure public opinion but to manipulate — “push” — voters away from one candidate and toward the opposing candidate. Such polls defame selected candidates by spreading false or misleading information about them. The intent is to disseminate campaign propaganda under the guise of conducting a legitimate public opinion poll. Read AAPOR’s statement on “push” polls.
As members of AAPOR, a professional organization which relies on public cooperation to gather information that is useful in formulating public policy as well as in understanding the public’s preferences for products and services, we condemn these practices in the strongest terms.